I found an article on nbcnews.com that I thought was
interesting. It says that the baby boomers shifted their loyalty from American
cars to foreign cars. Better gas mileage and reliability were the driving force
behind this shift. It seems now that the millennials have reversed this shift
in favor of American cars. Data shows that Japanese makers have seen their
share among 18 to 24 years olds decline by 9.8 percent since 2008. It seems
that looks is everything for these young buyers claiming that the American cars
look cooler and are a lot more fun to drive than the foreign competition.
Toyota created Scion, a line of vehicles marketed directly
to the younger buyer. What else can foreign auto makers do to regain the young
car buyer?Friday, April 5, 2013
Saturday, March 30, 2013
In response to Katie Longchamp
What
are some other products that you can think of that can use an undifferentiated
strategy to market their products?
The
first product that comes to mind is beef. In the early 90’s the beef council ran
ads with the following slogan, “Beef. It’s what’s for dinner.” Ads for travel,
like the ones for Michigan, California and Jamaica and auto insurance fit into
this category. Their mass marketing
effort gives them more bang for the buck.
Is there a way that the beef council can use a different strategy?
Sheep or a Wolf
Have you ever wondered, outside of a marketing class, why
you buy what you buy? There are of course needs which have to filled
however much of what we spend goes way beyond needs. It could be argued, and I’m
sure it has, that an IPad and a pair of Jimmy Choo’s are needs. Think about
your gym membership which you visit so infrequently. Americans spend an
estimated $330 billion a year on clothing. We buy for the life we want to have—cocktail dresses for parties we
never go to or fancy new workout clothes for the gym we never visit. Another
estimate says that we spent about $370 million last year on our pets Halloween costumes.
By playing on our delusions and our fears, companies tempt us to shell
out for needless items, and that can be a burden on our finances.
I have bought and will continue to buy things which go beyond what I need. I'm not suggesting that you stop buying things you want, but perhaps a little thought might be given to what you need before you buy your next bottle of vitamin water.
When you buy stuff, do you follow the crowd like a sheep,
and buy what everyone else does? Yoga pants and Uggs comes to mind. Or do you defy
convention and follow your own path?
Saturday, March 23, 2013
In response to Gina's post
Reference groups are only one tool that can help you with a
buying decision. For some, buying decisions require a lot of thought to analyze
all the information about a particular product. Most people respect the
opinions of the people they are closest to and these opinions can be a good
starting point in your buying decision making process.
Truth in advertising
I found this ad for American Eagle Outfitters. (Please
watch) http://creativity-online.com/work/american-eagle-outfitters-skinny-skinny-jeans/31047
It is an ad for skinny jeans. At the end of the video there is a link to the
AEO website. When you try to purchase these jeans, a pop up informs you they
are out of stock and if you give them your email they will let you know when
they are back in stock.
This has probably generated a lot of traffic to their web
site and perhaps even some purchases of products that are “in stock”, which is
their intent. But is this type of ad fair to consumers? Does it cross any ethical
or legal boundaries?
Saturday, March 16, 2013
In response to Haley’s post
I used bundling or packages all the time in my
business. By showing products together and how they are related to each other and
selling those products at a reduced price by bundling them is a good way to
provide the customer with products at a good price. Most people are looking for
a “good deal” and this usually includes getting more for less. Tools are a good
example of bundling.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Product Placement
Aren’t commercials enough? Do we really need to watch our
favorite show, see a movie or catch the game without having all those name
drops and visualizations of products? I personally don’t care if all the
vehicles on TV show are Chevrolets. It doesn’t matter if someone is drinking a Coke
instead of Pepsi. Is it going to influence your buying decisions if there is a
Nike swoosh on your favorite, or not so favorite, college basketball team?
(March madness you know)
I hope that people realize that an arrangement, usually
involving money, was made so that those products can be in all those places I
mentioned and that the characters on TV and in movies did not choose those
products themselves.
Just one more question. Does product placement make a difference for you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)